|
|
|
[Back to Index] [Back to 2006 Texas Case Summaries]
Armstrong v.
Roberts, MiscellaneousPower of AttorneyFather named Daughter as his agent under a non-statutory power of attorney. Using this authority, Daughter opened three pay on death certificates of deposit naming various individuals, including herself, as the pay on death payees. The court concluded that Daughter had the authority to open the CDs because the power of attorney granted her broad and unlimited powers such as the power “to do any and every act and exercise any and every power that I might or could do or exercise.” However, the court held that Daughter did not have the
authority to designate the pay on death payees. The court relied on Moral: An agent lacks the authority to name pay on death payees. MiscellaneousMultiple-Party AccountsDesignation of Pay on Death PayeesThe appellate court held that an agent under a power of
attorney lacks the authority to designate a pay on death payee. The court
relied on Moral: An agent lacks the authority to name pay on death payees. MiscellaneousMultiple-Party AccountsLanguage Sufficient to Create Survivorship RightsThe front of the signature card for a joint account read,
“Ownership: Joint w suv.” The court indicated that standing alone, this
language was insufficient to create survivorship rights under
Moral: To avoid problems, financial institutions should follow the statutory safe harbor language when creating multiple-party accounts and give serious consideration to using the statutory form in Probate Code 439A. |